Extraction form for project: Interventions for intermittent exotropia (2013)

Arms

Arm NameArm Description
Bilateral lateral rectus recession
Unilateral lateral rectus recessionunilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection.

Arm Details

1. number of eyes/participants randomized in this study:
Bilateral lateral rectus recession
Unilateral lateral rectus recession
2. number of eyes/participants lost follow-up in this study:
Bilateral lateral rectus recession
Unilateral lateral rectus recession
3. number of eyes/participants analyzed in this study:
Bilateral lateral rectus recession
Unilateral lateral rectus recession
4. Description of interventions:
Type "None" if no additional description
Bilateral lateral rectus recession
Unilateral lateral rectus recession

Outcomes

TypeDomainSpecific MeasurementPopulationsTimepoints
ContinuousNumber of satisfactory resultssatisfactory: between 10 dioptres exophoria and 5 dioptres esophoria
  • All Participants
  • 12 (months)
  • 15 (months)
ContinuousNumber of unsatisfactory resultsNumber of unsatisfactory results: any manifest deviation or postoperative treatment, including overcorrected and undercorrected.
  • All Participants
  • 12 (months)
  • 15 (months)

Design

1. Page
2. Methods
3. Children diagnosed with basic X(T)
4. Interventions
5. At a minimum of 1 year post surgery (12 to 15 months)
6. Satisfactory
7. Unsatisfactory
8. Notes
9. Random sequence generation (selection bias):Authors' judgement
10. Random sequence generation (selection bias):Support for judgement
11. Allocation concealment (selection bias):Authors' judgement
12. Allocation concealment (selection bias):Support for judgement
13. Blinding (performance bias and detection bias):Authors' judgement
14. Blinding (performance bias and detection bias):Support for judgement
15. Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias):Authors' judgement
16. Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias):Support for judgement
17. Selective reporting (reporting bias):Authors' judgement
18. Selective reporting (reporting bias):Support for judgement
19. Other bias:Authors' judgement
20. Other bias:Support for judgement

Outcome Details

1. Were data available?
Example of selecting "No": (1) precision measures were not reported anywhere in the text or graphs; (2) reported only statistical significance without providing the exact P value.
Number of satisfactory results
Number of unsatisfactory results
2. Time points for which data were reported:
Only specify other time points if >12 months
Number of satisfactory results
Baseline
One or more time points after baseline and ≤12 months
Other (please specify):
Number of unsatisfactory results
Baseline
One or more time points after baseline and ≤12 months
Other (please specify):
3. Any other relevant information about how data were collected or reported?
Type "None" if no additional comments
Number of satisfactory results
Number of unsatisfactory results

Baselines

N/A

Results

Continuous


Number of satisfactory results (satisfactory: between 10 dioptres exophoria and 5 dioptres esophoria)

All Participants
Descriptive StatisticsBetween Arm Comparisons
Bilateral lateral rectus recessionUnilateral lateral rectus recession
12 (months)
N Analyzed
Satisfactory outcomes
15 (months)
N Analyzed
Satisfactory outcomes
Within Arm ComparisonsNet Comparisons
Bilateral lateral rectus recessionUnilateral lateral rectus recession

Number of unsatisfactory results (Number of unsatisfactory results: any manifest deviation or postoperative treatment, including overcorrected and undercorrected.)

All Participants
Descriptive StatisticsBetween Arm Comparisons
Bilateral lateral rectus recessionUnilateral lateral rectus recession
12 (months)
N Analyzed
Satisfactory outcomes
15 (months)
N Analyzed
Satisfactory outcomes
Within Arm ComparisonsNet Comparisons
Bilateral lateral rectus recessionUnilateral lateral rectus recession

Quality

1. Adjust Quality Rating (for Key Questions: 1)
Quality Guideline Used:
Select Current Overall Rating:
Notes on this Rating: