- Title
-
Labor Dystocia
- Description
-
Objectives: This review evaluates the comparative effectiveness of different strategies for treating labor dystocia in women with otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies.
Data Sources: We searched PubMed®, Embase®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), limiting the searches to studies in the English-language and comparative studies published from January 1, 2005, to February 15,2019.
Review Methods: Two investigators screened each abstract and full-text article for inclusion, abstracted data, rated quality and applicability, and graded evidence. When possible, random-effects models were used to compute summary estimates of effects.
- Attribution
-
N/A
-
Authors of Report
-
N/A
-
Methodology description
-
We searched PubMed®, Embase®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), limiting the searches to studies in the English-language and comparative studies published from January 1, 2005, to February15,2019.
Two investigators screened each abstract and full-text article for inclusion, abstracted the data, and performed quality ratings and evidence grading. Random-effects models were used to compute summary estimates of effects.
See the review protocol (https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/topics/labor-dystocia/research-protocol) for full details.
- PROSPERO
-
CRD42016035567
- DOI
-
N/A
- Notes
-
This project was entered retrospectively. All Data Abstraction is available in the attached file: Labor_Data_Upload.docx
- Funding Source
-
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)