Extraction form for project: Acupuncture for glaucoma (2013)

Arm Details

1. Number of eyes/participants randomized in this study
Auricular acupressure:
Multiple Choice
Participants...
Eyes...
Check here if not reported/can’t tell...
2. Number of eyes/participants lost follow-up in this study
Auricular acupressure:
Multiple Choice
Participants...
Eyes...
Check here if not reported/can’t tell...
3. Number of eyes/participants analyzed in this study
Auricular acupressure:
Multiple Choice
Participants...
Eyes...
Check here if not reported/can’t tell...
4. Description of interventions
Type "None" if no additional description
Auricular acupressure:

Design

1. Study design
2. Number randomized (total and per group)
3. Number analyzed (total and per group)
4. Exclusions and loss to follow-up
5. Study follow-up
6. Country
7. Age (mean +/- SD, range), years
8. Gender
9. Inclusion criteria
10. Exclusion criteria
11. Treatment or intervention 1
12. Control or intervention 2
13. General procedures (e.g., pre-op or post-op tests, medications, procedures)
14. Primary outcome(s)
15. Secondary outcome(s)
16. Measurements taken, specify intervals at which outcomes assessed
17. Unit of analysis (individual or eye)
18. Other issues with outcome assessment (e.g., quality control for outcomes if any)
19. Study dates
20. Funding source(s)
21. Publication language
22. Random sequence generation (selection bias):Authors' judgement
23. Random sequence generation (selection bias):Support for judgement
24. Allocation concealment (selection bias):Authors' judgement
25. Allocation concealment (selection bias):Support for judgement
26. Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias):Authors' judgement
27. Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias):Support for judgement
28. Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias):Authors' judgement
29. Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias):Support for judgement
30. Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias):Authors' judgement
31. Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias):Support for judgement
32. Selective reporting (reporting bias):Authors' judgement
33. Selective reporting (reporting bias):Support for judgement
34. Other bias:Authors' judgement
35. Other bias:Support for judgement

Outcome Details

1. Were data available?
Change in visual field:
Single Choice
Yes, precision measures are numeric and can be extracted for meta-analysis
Yes, but precision measures cannot be extracted accurately (e.g., presented in a difficult-to-read graph or only P value reported)
No
Can't tell
2. Time points for which data were reported:
Only specify other time points if >3 years; select N/A when outcome not reported by this trial
Change in visual field:
Short term: outcomes up to one year
Single Choice
Yes
No
Can't tell
N/A
Long term: longer than one year
Single Choice
Yes
No
Can't tell
N/A
Other (please specify):
3. Any other relevant information about how data were collected or reported?
Type "None" if no additional comments
Change in visual field:

Baselines

N/A

Quality

1. Adjust Quality Rating (for Key Questions: 1)
Quality Guideline Used:
Select Current Overall Rating:
Single Choice
Notes on this Rating:

Suggested Arms

NameDescription
Auricular acupressure
Sham

Please see downloadable data for more

Suggested Outcomes

TypeDomainSpecific Measurement
CategoricalEconomic data
CategoricalProgression of optic disc damage or nerve fiber layer loss
Categoricalquality of life
ContinuousChange in visual acuity
ContinuousChange in visual field
ContinuousReduction of IOP

Please see downloadable data for more