Literature Update for Acute Treatments for Episodic Migraine

Project Summary Title and Description

Title
Literature Update for Acute Treatments for Episodic Migraine
Description
This is a literature update to the Acute Treatments for Episodic Migraine Systematic review, which had the objective of evaluating the effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for the acute treatment of episodic migraine in adults. The resulting surveillance reports will identify the latest evidence published since the report and put them in the context of what is known.
Attribution
N/A
Authors of Report
N/A
Methodology description
Systematic Review
PROSPERO
N/A
DOI
N/A
Notes
N/A
Funding Source
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Key Questions

1. KQ1 Opioid Therapy. KQ1a. What is the comparative effectiveness of opioid therapy versus: (1) nonopioid pharmacologic therapy (e.g., acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], triptans, ergot alkaloids, combination analgesics, muscle relaxants, antinausea medications, and cannabis) or (2) nonpharmacologic therapy (e.g., exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, acupuncture, biofeedback, noninvasive neuromodulation devices) for outcomes related to pain, function, pain relief satisfaction, and quality of life and after followup at the following intervals: <1 day; 1 day to <1 week; 1 week to <2 weeks; 2 weeks to 4 weeks? KQ1b. How does effectiveness of opioid therapy vary depending on: (1) patient demographics (e.g., age, race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status [SES]); (2) patient medical comorbidities (previous opioid use, body mass index [BMI]); (3) dose of opioids; (4) duration of opioid therapy, including number of opioid prescription refills and quantity of pills used? KQ1c. What are the harms of opioid therapy versus nonopioid pharmacologic therapy or nonpharmacologic therapy with respect to: (1) misuse, opioid use disorder, and related outcomes; (2) overdose; (3) medication overuse headache (MOH); (4) other harms, including gastrointestinal-related harms, falls, fractures, motor vehicle accidents, endocrinologic harms, infections, cardiovascular events, cognitive harms, and psychological harms (e.g., depression)? KQ1d. How do harms vary depending on: (1) patient demographics (e.g., age, gender); (2) patient medical comorbidities; (3) the dose of opioid used; (4) the duration of opioid therapy? KQ1e. What are the effects of prescribing opioid therapy versus not prescribing opioid therapy for acute treatment of episodic migraine pain on (1) short-term (<3 months) continued need for prescription pain relief, such as need for opioid refills, and (2) long-term opioid use (3 months or greater)? KQ1f. For patients with episodic migraine being considered for opioid therapy for acute treatment, what is the accuracy of instruments for predicting risk of opioid misuse, opioid use disorder, or overdose? KQ1g. For patients with episodic migraine being considered for opioid therapy for acute treatment, what is the effectiveness of instruments for predicting risk of opioid misuse, opioid use disorder, or overdose? KQ1h. For patients with episodic migraine being considered for opioid therapy for acute treatment, what is the effect of the following risk mitigation strategies on the decision to prescribe opioids: (1) existing opioid management plans; (2) patient education; (3) clinician and patient values and preferences related to opioids; (4) urine drug screening; (5) use of prescription drug monitoring program data; (6) availability of close followup?
2. KQ2. Nonopioid pharmacologic therapy. KQ2a. What is the comparative effectiveness of nonopioid pharmacologic therapy (e.g., acetaminophen, NSAIDs, triptans, ergot alkaloids, combination analgesics, muscle relaxants, anti-nausea medications, and cannabis) versus: (1) other nonopioid pharmacologic treatments, such as those in a different medication class; or (2) nonpharmacologic therapy for outcomes related to pain, function, pain relief satisfaction, and quality of life after followup at the following intervals: <1 day; 1 day to <1 week; 1 week to <2 weeks; 2 weeks to 4 weeks? KQ2b. How does effectiveness of nonopioid pharmacologic therapy vary depending on: (1) patient demographics (e.g., age, race, ethnicity, gender); (2) patient medical comorbidities; (3) the type of nonopioid medication; (4) dose of medication; (5) duration of treatment? KQ2c. What are the harms of nonopioid pharmacologic therapy versus other nonopioid pharmacologic therapy or nonpharmacologic therapy with respect to: (1) misuse; (2) overdose; (3) MOH; (4) other harms, including gastrointestinal-related harms, cardiovascular-related harms, kidney-related harms, falls, fractures, motor vehicle accidents, endocrinological harms, infections, cognitive harms, and psychological harms (e.g., depression)? KQ2d. How do harms vary depending on: (1) patient demographics (e.g., age, gender); (2) patient medical comorbidities; (3) the type of nonopioid medication; (4) dose of medication; (5) the duration of therapy?
3. KQ3. Nonpharmacologic therapy. KQ3a. What is the comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacologic therapy versus sham treatment, waitlist, usual care, attention control, and no treatment after followup at the following intervals: <1 day; 1 day to <1 week; 1 week to <2 weeks; 2 weeks to 4 weeks? KQ3b. What is the comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacologic treatments (e.g., exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, acupuncture, biofeedback, noninvasive neuromodulation devices) for outcomes related to pain, function, pain relief satisfaction, and quality of life? KQ3c. How does effectiveness of nonpharmacologic therapy vary depending on: (1) patient demographics (e.g., age, gender); (2) patient medical comorbidities? KQ3d. How do harms vary depending on: (1) patient demographics (e.g., age, gender); (2) patient medical comorbidities; (3) the type of treatment used; (4) the frequency of therapy; (5) the duration of therapy?

Associated Extraction Forms

Type
Standard

Associated Studies (each link opens a new tab)

Title Authors Year
Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine. Goadsby Peter J, Wietecha Linda A, Dennehy Ellen B, Kuca Bernice, Case Michael G, Aurora Sheena K, Gaul Charly 2019
Lasmiditan is an effective acute treatment for migraine: A phase 3 randomized study. Kuca Bernice, Silberstein Stephen D, Wietecha Linda, Berg Paul H, Dozier Gregory, Lipton Richard B, COL MIG-301 Study Group 2018
Efficacy and tolerability of lasmiditan, an oral 5-HT(1F) receptor agonist, for the acute treatment of migraine: a phase 2 randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging study. Färkkilä Markus, Diener Hans-Christoph, Géraud Gilles, Láinez Miguel, Schoenen Jean, Harner Nadja, Pilgrim Alison, Reuter Uwe, COL MIG-202 study group 2012
Acute treatment of migraine with the selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan--a randomised proof-of-concept trial. Ferrari Michel D, Färkkilä Markus, Reuter Uwe, Pilgrim Alison, Davis Charles, Krauss Martin, Diener Hans-Christoph, European COL-144 Investigators 2010
Randomized, controlled trial of lasmiditan over four migraine attacks: Findings from the CENTURION study. Ashina M, Reuter U, Smith T, Krikke-Workel J, Klise SR, Bragg S, Doty EG, Dowsett SA, Lin Q, Krege JH 2021 Mar
Phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled study of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in Japanese patients. Sakai F, Takeshima T, Homma G, Tanji Y, Katagiri H, Komori M 2021 May

Downloadable Data Content

Files
  • XLSX Project Data