Extraction form for project: The effect of volunteering on the health and wellbeing of volunteers: an umbrella review

Design Details

1. Review ID
(surname of first author and year first full report of study was published e.g. Smith 2001)
2. Review title
3. Date form completed
4. Initials of person extracting
5. Review funding source
6. Possible conflicts of interest
7. Aim of review
8. Number of databases searched
9. Names of databases searched; date ranges of databases searched
10. Date of last search
11. Number of included studies
12. Exclusion criteria for participants
(e.g age, comorbidities)
13. Exclusion criteria for volunteering
(e.g type of volunteering, for a specific organistion/purpose)
14. Exclusion criteria for study type
15. Exclusion criteria for outcome measures
16. Outcomes studied
(select all that apply)
Multiple Choice
Psychological
Physical
Social
General
17. Primary reported outcomes
18. Secondary reported outcomes (if applicable)
19. Number of participants included in the review
20. Review’s included study type (% of quant studies)
21. Included studies countries of publication
22. Range of included studies years of publication
23. Review’s population
(age, ethnicity, SES)
24. Social outcomes reported
Dependency
  • Question Position: 16
    • - Option: Social
    25. Social outcomes not supported
    (e.g cited as non-significant)
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 16
    • - Option: Social
    26. Physical outcomes reported
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 16
    • - Option: Physical
    27. Physical outcomes not supported
    (e.g cited as non-significant)
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 16
    • - Option: Physical
    28. Psychological outcomes reported
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 16
    • - Option: Psychological
    29. Psychological outcomes not supported
    (e.g cited as non-significant)
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 16
    • - Option: Psychological
    30. General outcomes reported
    (i.e general health and wellbeing)
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 16
    • - Option: General
    31. General outcomes not supported
    (e.g cited as non-significant)
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 16
    • - Option: General
    32. Interactions reported
    (i.e between each other or demographic variables)
    33. Was a meta-analysis performed?
    Single Choice
    Yes
    No
    34. Number of included studies in the meta-analysis
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 33
    • - Option: Yes
    35. Heterogeneity
    (e.g I squared)
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 33
    • - Option: Yes
    36. Pooled estimates
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 33
    • - Option: Yes
    37. Confidence intervals (95%)
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 33
    • - Option: Yes
    38. Key conclusions from study authors
    39. Review limitations
    40. AMSTAR 2 quality appraisal rating
    41. Quality appraisal tool used by review (if applicable)
    42. Quality of included studies (if applicable)
    43. Publication bias reported (if applicable)
    44. Was correspondence required for further study information?
    Single Choice
    Yes
    No
    45. What further correspondence was required, and from whom?
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 44
    • - Option: Yes
    46. What further study information was requested (from whom, what and when)?
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 44
    • - Option: Yes
    47. What correspondence was received (from whom, what and when)?
    Dependency
  • Question Position: 44
    • - Option: Yes