Extraction form for project: Screening for Glaucoma in Adults - 1 of 2

Design Details

1. Study design

Arms

Arm NameArm Description
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)
B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)

Sample Characteristics

1. N
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)
B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
Total
2. Baseline population
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)
B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
Total

Outcomes

TypeDomainSpecific measurement (i.e., tool/definition/specific outcome)PopulationsTimepoints
CategoricalMean (logMAR) distance VA (n=503)
  • All Participants
  • end of study
CategoricalMean (logMAR) near VA (n=499)
  • All Participants
  • end of study
CategoricalNEI-VFQ-25: mean composite score
  • All Participants
  • end of study
CategoricalFalls, >1 fallResults from Cumming 2007 publication
  • All Participants
  • end of study
CategoricalFalls, in totalResults from Cumming 2007 publication
  • All Participants
  • end of study
CategoricalFracturesResults from Cumming 2007 publication
  • All Participants
  • end of study
CategoricalFalls, >2 fallsResults from Cumming 2007 publication
  • All Participants
  • end of study

Risk of Bias Assessment

1. Random assignment
2. Allocation concealed
3. Groups similar at baseline
4. Eligibility criteria specified
5. Blinding: outcome assessors or data analysts
6. Intention-to-treat analysis
7. Reporting of attrition, contamination, etc.
8. Differential loss to followup or overall high loss to followup
9. Appropriate analysis including cluster correlation
10. Funding source
11. Randomization adequate?
12. Allocation concealment adequate?
13. Groups similar at baseline?
14. Eligibility criteria specified?
15. Outcome assessors masked?
16. Care provider masked?
17. Patient masked?
18. Attrition and withdrawals reported?
19. Loss to followup differential/ high?
20. People analyzed in the groups in which they were randomized?
21. Quality

Results

Categorical


Mean (logMAR) distance VA (n=503)

All Participants
Descriptive StatisticsBetween Arm Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
vs.
end of study
logMAR
Relative Risk
NEI-VFQ-25
95% CI
Total (N analyzed)
Fall incidence rate ratio
Events
Odds Ratio (OR)
Percentage
95% CI low (OR)
95% CI high (OR)
p value
Within Arm ComparisonsNet Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
vs.

Mean (logMAR) near VA (n=499)

All Participants
Descriptive StatisticsBetween Arm Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
All Arms (ANOVA)
end of study
logMAR
Relative Risk
NEI-VFQ-25
95% CI
Total (N analyzed)
Fall incidence rate ratio
Events
Odds Ratio (OR)
Percentage
95% CI low (OR)
95% CI high (OR)
p value
Within Arm ComparisonsNet Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
All Arms (ANOVA)

NEI-VFQ-25: mean composite score

All Participants
Descriptive StatisticsBetween Arm Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
vs.
end of study
logMAR
Relative Risk
NEI-VFQ-25
95% CI
Total (N analyzed)
Fall incidence rate ratio
Events
Odds Ratio (OR)
Percentage
95% CI low (OR)
95% CI high (OR)
p value
Within Arm ComparisonsNet Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
vs.

Falls, >1 fall (Results from Cumming 2007 publication)

All Participants
Descriptive StatisticsBetween Arm Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
All Arms (ANOVA)
end of study
logMAR
Relative Risk
NEI-VFQ-25
95% CI
Total (N analyzed)
Fall incidence rate ratio
Events
Odds Ratio (OR)
Percentage
95% CI low (OR)
95% CI high (OR)
p value
Within Arm ComparisonsNet Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
All Arms (ANOVA)

Falls, in total (Results from Cumming 2007 publication)

All Participants
Descriptive StatisticsBetween Arm Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
All Arms (ANOVA)
end of study
logMAR
Relative Risk
NEI-VFQ-25
95% CI
Total (N analyzed)
Fall incidence rate ratio
Events
Odds Ratio (OR)
Percentage
95% CI low (OR)
95% CI high (OR)
p value
Within Arm ComparisonsNet Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
All Arms (ANOVA)

Fractures (Results from Cumming 2007 publication)

All Participants
Descriptive StatisticsBetween Arm Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
All Arms (ANOVA)
end of study
logMAR
Relative Risk
NEI-VFQ-25
95% CI
Total (N analyzed)
Fall incidence rate ratio
Events
Odds Ratio (OR)
Percentage
95% CI low (OR)
95% CI high (OR)
p value
Within Arm ComparisonsNet Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
All Arms (ANOVA)

Falls, >2 falls (Results from Cumming 2007 publication)

All Participants
Descriptive StatisticsBetween Arm Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
All Arms (ANOVA)
end of study
logMAR
Relative Risk
NEI-VFQ-25
95% CI
Total (N analyzed)
Fall incidence rate ratio
Events
Odds Ratio (OR)
Percentage
95% CI low (OR)
95% CI high (OR)
p value
Within Arm ComparisonsNet Comparisons
A. Comprehensive vision and eye examination, including referal to opthalmologist or public hospital eye clinic and/or occupational therapist for home modifications, mobility training, or canes (n=309)B. No vision assessment or intervention/usual care (n=307)
All Arms (ANOVA)