Your web browser does not support Javascript, or you have it turned off. Please turn on Javascript or use a Javascript-compatible web browser to take advantage of the full functionality of SRDR Plus.
>
seemless p Browser does not support iframes. Please update your browser to for a better viewing experience.
Home
Blog
Published Projects
Search
Contact
About
Help
Login
Register
Open main menu
Home
Blog
Published Projects
Search
Contact
About
Help
Login
Register
Design Details
Print Data
Extraction form for project: The effect of volunteering on the health and wellbeing of volunteers: an umbrella review
Design Details
1. Review ID
(surname of first author and year first full report of study was published e.g. Smith 2001)
Howard 2022
2. Review title
The antecedents and outcomes of corporate volunteering: an employee- and organizational-level meta-analysis
3. Date form completed
05/08/2022
4. Initials of person extracting
BN
5. Review funding source
None declared
6. Possible conflicts of interest
None declared
7. Aim of review
To review corporate volunteering programmes, to investigate the base of research on corporate volunteering, to identify which effect is stronger (organisational or individual level partiicpation), and to summarize current literature on corporate volunteering, and propose directions for future research. To explore the following hypotheses: Organizational participation in corporate volunteering positively relates to employee participation in corporate volunteering. Participating in corporate volunteering programs positively relates to (a) well-being, (b) commitment, (c) job satisfaction and (d) positive employee behaviors. Organizational participation in employee volunteering programs positively relates to the employee-level outcomes of (a) well-being, (b) commitment, (c) job satisfaction and (d) positive employee behaviors.
8. Number of databases searched
4
9. Names of databases searched; date ranges of databases searched
Google Scholar and EBSCO databases. EBSCO includes multiple other databases (e.g. Academic Search Complete, Business Source Complete and PsycInfo).
10. Date of last search
May 2020
11. Number of included studies
57
12. Exclusion criteria for participants
(e.g age, comorbidities)
Organisational or employee level participation in volunteering programmes
13. Exclusion criteria for volunteering
(e.g type of volunteering, for a specific organistion/purpose)
participation in corporate volunteering programs
14. Exclusion criteria for study type
Quantitative studies
15. Exclusion criteria for outcome measures
Effect sizes relating to one of the hypotheses
16. Outcomes studied
(select all that apply)
Psychological
Physical
Social
General
17. Primary reported outcomes
Organisational level and individual level benefits (related to wellbeing and job performance./satisfaction)
18. Secondary reported outcomes (if applicable)
None
19. Number of participants included in the review
No information
20. Review’s included study type (% of quant studies)
100% quantitative
21. Included studies countries of publication
No information
22. Range of included studies years of publication
No information
23. Review’s population
(age, ethnicity, SES)
24. Social outcomes reported
25. Social outcomes not supported
(e.g cited as non-significant)
26. Physical outcomes reported
27. Physical outcomes not supported
(e.g cited as non-significant)
28. Psychological outcomes reported
Job satisfaction: Employee participation had a very small, positive and nonsignificant relation with job satisfaction. Organizational participation had a significant relation with job satisfaction. To probe this effect, we assessed whether the relations of organizational participation with employee-level outcomes were stronger than the relations of employee participation, wherein the type of participation was the sole dummy-coded predictor in the meta-regression. The dummy variable was significant for job satisfaction.
29. Psychological outcomes not supported
(e.g cited as non-significant)
30. General outcomes reported
(i.e general health and wellbeing)
Wellbeing: although the effect was moderate in size, the relation of employee participation with well-being was positive and nonsignificant. Organizational participation had a significant relation with wellbeing. To probe this effect, we assessed whether the relations of organizational participation with employee-level outcomes were stronger than the relations of employee participation, although this was not significant.
31. General outcomes not supported
(e.g cited as non-significant)
32. Interactions reported
(i.e between each other or demographic variables)
Organistional participation was a better predictor of job satisfaction than employee level participation, but the same did not apply for wellbeing.
33. Was a meta-analysis performed?
-- Select response --
Yes
No
34. Number of included studies in the meta-analysis
Employee-level participation and job satisfaction: 7 Organisational-level participation and job satisfaction: 4 Employee-level participation and wellbeing: 4 Organisational-level participation and wellbeing: 3
35. Heterogeneity
(e.g I squared)
No measure
36. Pooled estimates
Sample size weighted average correlation: Employee-level participation and job satisfaction: .06 Organisational-level participation and job satisfaction: .31 Employee-level participation and wellbeing: .22 Organisational-level participation and wellbeing: .24
37. Confidence intervals (95%)
Employee-level participation and job satisfaction: –0.02, 0.15 Organisational-level participation and job satisfaction: 0.24, 0.37 Employee-level participation and wellbeing: –0.12, 0.51 Organisational-level participation and wellbeing: 0.11, 0.36
38. Key conclusions from study authors
Our results supported a moderate relation between organizational and employee participation in corporate volunteering program, suggesting that employees devote more time to corporate volunteering as organizations devote more resources. Employee participation had nonsignificant or small relations with the employeelevel outcomes of well-being, commitment, job satisfaction and positive employee behaviors. Organizational participation, however, significantly related to all employee-level outcomes. Organizational participation had a significantly larger effect on job satisfaction and positive employee behaviors than employee participation.
39. Review limitations
None discussed.
40. AMSTAR 2 quality appraisal rating
-17
41. Quality appraisal tool used by review (if applicable)
None
42. Quality of included studies (if applicable)
N/A
43. Publication bias reported (if applicable)
Analyses suggest that publication biases are not a concern in our analyses
44. Was correspondence required for further study information?
-- Select response --
Yes
No
45. What further correspondence was required, and from whom?
46. What further study information was requested (from whom, what and when)?
47. What correspondence was received (from whom, what and when)?
Print Data
seemless p Browser does not support iframes. Please update your browser to for a better viewing experience.